Snowden Archive
——
The SIDtoday
Files
Browse the Archive

SIGINT Then and Now: Vietnam vs Iraq

SUMMARY

A former Army analysts compared the role of signals intelligence now versus during the Vietnam war.

DOCUMENT’S DATE

Mar 02, 2009

PUBLICLY AVAILABLE

May 29, 2019

1/3
Download
Page 1 from SIGINT Then and Now: Vietnam vs Iraq
DYNAMIC PAGE -- HIGHEST POSSIBLE CLASSIFICATION IS TOP SECRET // SI / TK // REL TO USA AUS CAN GBR NZL (U//FOUO) SIGINT Then and Now: Vietnam vs Iraq FROM: Recent deployer to Iraq (who just retired from NSA) Run Dates: 03/02/2009 , 03/03/2009 (U//FOUO) A former Army signals analyst compares his recent deployment in Iraq to his experiences in the Vietnam War. (S//SI//REL) As I sit here waiting for my screen to fill with metadata and wondering why it's taking so long, I just laugh to myself at how things are so different now than when I participated in another war (Vietnam, 1970). Back then I was an enlisted soldier serving with the Army Security Agency under the Military Assistance Command Vietnam, assigned to the 8th Radio Research Field Station located at Phu Bai, just outside the city of Hue. The mission is basically the same -- ferret out the bad guys and target them -- but times have changed with respect to the manner in which it is done. The author in Vietnam The author in Iraq (U//FOUO) The author in Vietnam (left) and Iraq (S//SI//REL) In those days the enemy mainly used high frequency manual Morse communications, in which the radio frequency transmitter was easily (for the most part) located using direction finding (DF) techniques. Of course, during this era the derived lines of bearing were manually plotted and processed to determine the possible location of the transmitting signal.
Page 2 from SIGINT Then and Now: Vietnam vs Iraq
(S//SI//REL) As a DF Operator/Analyst and Morse qualified, I copied many a target and directed DF assets from within country and around the Pacific Theater to determine their approximate locations. Once the location was refined and the communications analyzed, strikes were usually carried out against the targets by either land, air, or sea forces, or any combination thereof. Afterwards, more often than not, the analyst would find that a sizeable enemy force had been decimated to ineffectiveness. However, most units were replenished with reinforcements from the north along the infamous Ho Chi Minh Trail. (S//SI//REL) One of the methods adopted by the enemy was to place the radio operator away from the main force while transmitting, lest the whole unit be targeted in one fell swoop. Other basic OPSEC/COMSEC* principles were also employed. As a result of effective targeting and the passage of time, a program was instituted called " chieu hoi ," which allowed the Viet Cong or North Vietnamese to surrender and be provided preferential treatment. However, some of those invoking the words "chieu hoi" only did so when their backs were against a wall after the ambush that they had set was turned against them. (S//SI//REL) As a volunteer today, serving in a civilian capacity as a member of a Cryptologic Support Team in Iraq,** I find that the enemy is no different in its doggedness to disrupt a country's goal in attaining basic freedoms. In today's environment, the enemy is mainly using the mobile phone to communicate, and targets at this stage of involvement are acquired -- mostly -- one at a time. (S//SI//REL)The phrase "find-fix-finish" has been the path to ferreting out the insurgents and terrorists in today's war. Our technology has allowed us to exploit a mobile communication for its content ("find") through a multitude of available databases, and pinpoint its location ("fix") within a very small radius using locational information inherent to the mobile network and/or air assets. Of course, today the majority of information is processed using computer algorithms, enabling the analysis to be done in a more efficient and timely manner. As a result, only a platoon-sized force (if that) is needed to action ("finish") the target. (S//SI//REL) Once again, the magnitude of our successes has led to changes or counteractions by those we desire to remove from the field. Periodically, communications collected from various factions have been noted stressing basic OPSEC/COMSEC procedures to minimize the chance of being targeted and captured. Nevertheless, there are still basic tendencies that may be exploited, given enough time and diligence by the analyst, which will eventually lead to the enemy's demise. Once again, success and time have evolved into reconciliation and amnesty programs which may be effective against the Iraqi insurgents, but not likely against the alQaeda elements. (U//FOUO) As my thoughts are now being drawn back to the metadata streaming across the computer monitor, it's time once again to focus on the present while remembering the past with equal satisfaction. (U) Notes: * (U) OPSEC = operations security; COMSEC = communications security ** (S//REL) The CST is assigned to the Combat Team and working alongside the SIGINT Platoon. Regiment Delta Troop (U//FOUO) Do you have any wartime SIGINT recollections of your own you'd like to share? Post them on the SIDtoday Blog .
Page 3 from SIGINT Then and Now: Vietnam vs Iraq
"(U//FOUO) SIDtoday articles may not be republished or reposted outside NSANet without the consent of S0121 (DL sid_comms)." DYNAMIC PAGE -- HIGHEST POSSIBLE CLASSIFICATION IS TOP SECRET // SI / TK // REL TO USA AUS CAN GBR NZL DERIVED FROM: NSA/CSSM 1-52, DATED 08 JAN 2007 DECLASSIFY ON: 20320108