Documents
Attachment 3-2 – 2019-202 Responsive Record
Nov. 8 2023 — 2:05 p.m.
+ 1 April 2018, JTF, [against Al-Shabaab (AS) fighters NE
in the vicinity of El Buur Somalia killing all occupants in the target
vehicle. A
+ During post-strike review by [INN it as assessed that one of the individuals targeted
in the strike was misidentified by the |ERN - - dt
‘male, and was actually an adult female with a child.
+ Facts from AR 154
+ Thel nad a disagreement as to whether [Gigli count of the
target vehicle was,
+ Only after the strike and multiple reviews of the NINE
I= it determined that Sx adults and 1x child loaded into the vehicle |ERINEIN
+ Findings from AR 15-6: =
+ One female and one child was killed in the strike. 7
+ Time was the biggest factor in the updated [ili thes able to methodically look
and relook at tape to confirm whereas thel was under perceived pressure to get thelglllout
as quickly as possible. | recommend that each senior analyst has a brief with their team prior to going
on shift to ensure the entire team has the correct mindset and highlights that accuracy is more
important than speed.
+ JTF JE Requirement. }
+ “Any discrepancy in SEMEN must be bricfed to the JTF [IMM regardless of where we are
in the strike process. All JOC personnel are empowered to speak up at any point.
SEeRETNOFORN
|
|
|
CIVCAS Allegation
Hs
| I
El Buur, Galguduud
SEORETINr OR
sa, HEADQUARTERS
=)
SR 18a 2018
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT Acton on Findings and Recommendations ~ AR 15-6 JTF Kinetic Ske against A
Savane Patter
+ on 29 May 2018 | appointed RMR - vest 3ng ofice to
investigate the facts an orcumstances suoundND Bhagalona that a dor Task Force Kinetic
strike against Al-Shabaab (AS) fighiers [EMME Co.cc i £|
Buur, Galguduud Somalia, on 1 Apri 2018. resulted in Cilan Casualties (CIVCAS
2. I nave reviewed the subject findings and recommendations dated 21 June 2018. | find the
followng
++ +
| agprove the finding in paragraph 4b that the applicable Rule of Engagement for ths
AR
© 1 3pprove the finding paragraph dc tat he sre comptes itn ERG
lel
1 | approve the fining in paragraph de that the quaity of the FMV feeds were not a causal
factor of CCAS.
anata ihe finding n paragraph af nat nothing nthe strike procedures employed by
7 IR personnel—sandard operating procedure for ail JTF [Qi nkes—contouted
10 cian castes
secacrieroRN
1 2pprove the finding in paragraph 4g that an adi female and a chid were kiled i the
sirke. This post sike assessment was made boy [QINGRGSMRRIGRASEREE ory: =
following extensive review of FMV
i.1 approve the finding in paragraph ah tht there was a disagreement as o the number of
Indiduas n he targeted vehicle and tha iis disagreement was not conveyed to EIR EIEN
ce A A
| approve with the following modifications gi
a ——
S—
seener
HEADQUARTERS
+ 21 June 2018
SUBJECT AR 16.8 Investigation nig Jou Task Fores kinetic sire against Al
1. Background {S| was appointed by Tr [MME on 29 May 2018 as an
invesigating officer (10) pursuant io Ay ReguBON 15.6. 1 determin me facts and
cicumsiances surrounding 1 APR 018 Jom Tak Force inet Sve samme a
2. Summary. (8) On 1 April 2018, TF Illlitook] shots fro [EINNRENNNN
agains A-Shabas (AS) mers a
1 Bur Somalia king al ccupanis ne target venice to mci
This was ie ineic ana a ie Ton i as covaopmont or 2 2 OA
accordance wih ine publahed TF During post
Sika review by th i tas assessed ha one of ADM iat
loaded into the vehicle at [lillllwas a Adult Female and child. This was assessed as
the survivor running away from vehicle post the first engagement at IRIE
5 Timeline Tris stk took place on 1 Apri 2018
24 Act Males (ADM) were observed enering the fargt vehice
2 additional ADs entered the venice, ENE
tne indidua tht tere he front righ side of
ine vericl eed and waked around he vehicle t the of ite meeting wis 3 mor
ADM was an ADM, Tis sam ADM inst oto. opened ne nt of do ans
another ADM exited NSE
IME the ADM that opened the left door of the vehicle, reentered the vehicle on
thejiont eft side. In the same minute. an individual EINES
10 56 an ADM
he Loni cheered decane i But fo ine Sout
a Se
I the venicie
hE POSSE coc AMINES
es
nat ihe venice occupants
—
SEeRE
+
SUBJECT AR 15:6
were AS operatives associated with no mate
noncombatants would be injured or Kile. and ro women or children
would be inured or kiled
4. Facts.
a)
on 1 Apri 2018, and
ODSEIVed 4 adults get nia the target venicio NING at tne @ adult
males included RIMGII was in the vehicle between Te
b. 15)
(Exhibit F)
eo) IRN cues tre su ve RR
ERR, zero issues. (Exhibit B and C)
oc) EN - screen © number of
passengers in the target vehicle. this wa: EISIMERIRRR =o een RMN
and INNS his iscussion to carly he
numbers in the veicie was aareed upon to be [gill all males. prior to informing
EARNER cen after IGM An agreed upon ail males
as passed io who then calcd
Te-reviewed ine FIV caplure and assessed that the final
venicle 10ad up was in fac{EBEMI nly after the rie and multiple reviews of the
vehicle 10ad up sequence was it determined that Sx adults and 1x child loaded
into the venicee. (Exhibits H and I) [ETS ET wee]
e (U) The average experience lev of the [EN on shift nad 1-8 years of
experience, however some members did not have any FMV experience. (Exhibit
£)
2
—SEeRE
+ EA
SUBJECT AR 155
evidence after thoroughly reviewing all of the enclosed exhibits.
2-81 facts and circumstances surrounding the inet tie, including a
destrplion of the target iw he Target was oho. wo she ese
strike was chosen, and the basis for the strike: The target [EISIGENNN 2s 2
valid target in accordance with the [EN EUGINSSN on the associated
5) identity the ROE under which this irks was axecuted: including the
wi Ea
IRemDbr ora Gectremnoste i TT eet tnd
GA nai Sgn Rr Sip ap mone Wo compo
with applicable les of ndagemont Ieiots stants pom oreo
swom statement fro |RISINIRRIRIR <x o',© GAR +n the ~cs on
IRE vo eet po RMR (<> /)
4.187 description of how the JTF evaluated whether nonzembatants would
be killed or injure in the strike, including [GRRE -'=
Whether tne JF doniiied noncombatane MEN or
killod or iniured noncombatants: According fo Fxtubiis F anc =n [NINSISS
rbd S|
Te = ET.
s
—
SkeRi
TF C—
SUBJECT. AR 15:6
&-(5) Describe the process used to determine [GEN identity any changes in
the assessment of IRE post:-strike; the discussions between the [QIEIESEEES
IE SIN ri GMI an as50ssmon of
whether the quality of the JOC feeds contributed to any discrepancies in
assessing is determine by both EMER
rained and qualified Analysts. For iis sirke. here are real-time.
I (1111. G)
157 A review of the targeting procedures used, to include strike authority, and
approval process: During my review of the [NUE stke. | reviewed the Sinke
procedures wih [GIRIBIGIEIENN personne. They confirmed that the procedures used for
his trie were the standard operating procedures uiiized for i [IBBlstrikes. Based
on my review of the procedures, interviews with personnel and review of stike videos
and chat logs. nothing in the strike procedures caused this inaccurate jRIRIER-all
(Exhibits B,C)
5. (5) If any civilian personnel were injured or killed, a determination of the
identity of those personnel, how and when did the determination of identity occur
and the likely cause and extent of the injuries: | assess that one female and one
child was killed in the strike. | base this assessment on the |EISINRRIERIN cam 5
extensive review of FMV of the strike by the most experienced FMV analysts in the INEGI
Due to the limited information availabe in post-srike reflections, the exact name of the
cians personnel kiled in the strike are not known at this ime and may never be
known
18) During the execution of the strike aoa SMM «1 either the
disagree on tho call, if so, was this over
conveyed to Yes, there was a disagreement on [MEG bt only
regarding numbers not sex or age This disasreement was rot conveyed to ENINENOMIIN
J Not uni extensive review by the [SNIMGHERGGINNN «ch the most
‘experienced FMV analysts in the [Glas 1 determined that » INNER onou/c
Lave been the coract all At no point during the events that ed up to the strike, or the.
ERE vo RRR vr tha hrs were women and children in the
Target vehicle. (ExniDIs H and |)
4
seenr—
seener
+
SUBJECT. AR 156
i. (U) Any other matters, recommendations. or lessons learned you deem
olovant to this inquiry. A member of the [QRRMRREon duty Mighioh hat due to a
Contracting issue. they have lost a ot of thei experiented personnel but he Ellis
put mitigation measures in lace by moving personnel between areas of operat fo
increase experience levels. Another member hghights that hey have team members
with 10 year of experience as an analyst but zero FMV experience. Members of the
team related tha they dd not consider themselves experienced whie one
personnel interviewed did consider the team in question to be exporiencec)
actually ha 17.5 years’ experience between the four member team. wih the youngest
member only having § manths working FAIV analysis and § months wih the. [EMG
operations. However, tn ill does not rack how much individual Aveas of
Responsibity (AOR) time each member works 50 inquired by the Investigating Officer
(10). the [QI responded with that information is not available (N/A) This could lead to a
very inexperienced crew working in an AOR due 0 ack of a Checks and Balance
system. Adcitonaly. when looking no tv [QRIRIGRRE+no how they were able to
recissy [RMR cd learn tha due o the adational requirement placed upon the
team they have access to ditional software and hardware. hie neither were actually
used for the updatecfIRl found that concerning that the daily teams do not have the
most up to date software and hardware needed or mission analysis. Time was the
biggest factor in the updated tel was adi to methodically look
and relook at tape to confirm whereas tl 125 under perceived pressure 0
get tel ut as quickly as possible. | recommend that each senior analyst has a
ref wih their team prior fo going on shif fo ensure the entire team has tha correct
mindset and highlights that accuracy is more important than speed. (Exhibits £. J and
K
o. RRRIRRERN pcr iENCE:
ei
A A i Sei
= A A
5
EERE
SECRES
EE
SUBJECT: AR 15:6
oo Ee ae ea,
5. Recommendations. | make the following recommendation based upon the findings.
| a
a
6. (U) The point of contact for this memorandum is the undersianed at DSN. SR
3Encis
1. Appointment Orders
2 DA Form 1574
3. Exhibits: A- K
6
seerer
Table of Contents
10's Report
1. Appointment Memo
2. 2. DA 167441
HR
8. 2 Sworn Statements EEE
. [Ee tration Sanda
DR,
£ CIveAs 15.6 aTAs REE
ER,
oR,
Tg H. Updated CCAR ICO
1 ives 156 RF EE reine EE
J. Experience Level
————————
SEeRERHORON—
r—
- sont 1ask rorce (I
or 20 vay 200
MEMORANDUM FOR a
SUBJECT: Appointment a Investigating Offer
{SHE Appointment. You sts herby sepals ss ar Iwestgalng off
Suan ion mui O00 15 nsession Sheers
surrounding allegations that a Joint Task Force kinetic strike against Al-Shabaab (AS)
fighters (MMI outed n £| Buu. Galguduud
Somalia, on 1 April 2018, resulted in civilian casualties (CIVCAS). This investigation is
i IE et in
I T_—_—_—_—————
retng om tre 7
Sra wh save = ou NRRL
aspect of hs veskanton: nein Top onTE a So rae me
EL —————
racers oun in Ghapirs 3 an A 50. Tharosgm Secumant a ness
isviowe wing bing CA ow 2055. Sw Sans oe a en
ove Se Co a Soa ie dg
Sivsr ar Slo Song a we Spa, So BE rt hr
rn er appliatle. stue
4. (U) Report of Investigation. Your findings should list the facts as you determine
hemo 5 re a Shou adress and rene ary meer aHSEn ou Sse 10
cence, Each io am oe sopping ora on ee
Tecommaraatons must 50 uppites oy ys ae. Sach vee rary anal
rans he otowing
RE —————
TE —
5) dent the ROE ur which hi se was exacts, includ he
EE corer
—secnermoroRn-
7
SUBJECT. Appoiniment as Investigating Officer
of a dectared hostile force or the imminence based on demonstrated hostile acts or
hose intent
©. 48}An analysis regarding whether the servicemembers involved complied with
applicable Rules of Engagement Include statements from all relevant witnesses;
4. (5) A description of how the JTF evaluated whethar noncombatants would be
Killed or injured in the strike, ENEMA "ne (he
JTF identified noncombatants before striking, and whether the strike Kiled of injured
noncombatants
e. Describe the process used to determine [RMR dentiy any changes in the
assessment of cost-strike, the discussions between the [IIIS
ae and assessment of whether the qualty of
the JOC feeds conirbuted to any discrepancies in assessing [INN
1. (5) A review of the targeting procedures used, to include strike authority, and
approval process:
9. 8)-If any civilian personnel were injured or killed, a determination of the identity
of those personnel, how and when did the determination of identity occur and the likely
cause and extent of the injuries;
h. (U) Any other matters, recommendations, o lessons leamed you deem relevant
o ths inquiry
5. (U) Suspense. Submit your report of investigation to your legal acisor for review
10 later than Friday. 15 June 2018 Submit any requests for extension through your
legal advisor. The JTF | RNRIAMRRRMAER = 275 ove extensions for Up to
seven additional days for 9003 cause
6. (UIFOUO) Security Classification. Ensure your investigation report, to include all
exhibits and attachments, i properly classified wih appropriate markings. You are to
produce your report atthe SECRET level. Exhibits may be classified ala higher lovel
mo LR
ESRETOROR
REPORT GF PROCEEDINGS BY INVESTIGATING GFFICER
Not Cotta om ra tan corr reo rotor an ee recog st oh AR 340.21
FORE SPACE S REGURED WELLING OUT ANY FORTON OF 145 FORME ATTACH ROOTONAL SHEETS
SECTION | APPONTHENT
roooress, EERO
oportng sity
on 20S tron anconu 1 Laterof cporsret or sey of rl sport da) Seo pars 15 AR 153)
oe
+ he ester cones «ER PM wo
= Tier
w_ mims
wn
2 Io (msg orn ested aowrgrenmy evconcna ooo on 080621 andor
oss ow
tose sd acommntors 0 Ce omen
Ter over
= SECTION CHECKS FOR PROCEEDS
x COMPLETE W ALL GASES na Jes wo]
endonrss pam 313 A 5
rr ing encod sc rr crs es Roan mer. Atco rin
DE EEE meen Fal]
[5 A orcas 5 3005775 ST Ar
[2 Prey At Serer Contr Ssamont posse? ao
3 Eraton yo stqi oe ry vs np, Ses eave 3 srs wna 03 re | (1 0)
a EE
= An thr sepot prs or a ae) BT A A THT — amy
7 An Exocue Suma. an of Es Chari of Pees sf 1 ss and 3 van Grea °
Compr sr sr ih rt cues
Try
5 A re rd str mo] er 3 0S A re ahr 3 tr RT
a CIEE]
15 eof i xs oro cowry gr oe a EOD
Fo re smn tomtf nc wiv bo oc ro oe 28 ven om rd hd | LTT 1
rv copes dscns, or das fst or corny van) soy arrow ho econ | 11
3 acre tori sr ee ote 10a
oe socrptors ers F Pogend C3 AR 1547 Too
[15 en tn hac io a rs tton ser mmo wna ori mets |g |
prt) HEE
FOOTNOTES 1 eo sep srr sens
20st kc re vt mB 7 Ao or
OR FORM 70-1 APR 075 TRE ESTOS TE CROCE TE pan
= = ETON FWOWGS 70 TTT
The (ivesigaing office). having carsuly consoared ihe evdence. fds. [Esch paragraph Shou Bo cre conclims Based on 7
awn gathered ung the investigation These ings shou provide answers 0 ach questo pose the apooing aunty Ihe
ppaniment memorandum. The evdonce hal supports each finding must be cred)
See Memorandum dud 21 June 2018
GR FOR TST APR OTE a2
SECON RECCRENORTIONS 523 TT TEE
In viow of the above incings. he (nuesigaiing oficar recommends: [Each paragraph shou be ae recommendation Gased on Fa Trndings
i Sacton IV. Adress what actors 1 any. shout! bo akan with regard 0 15 cls vowed, he und eadershp, an ony ops it
can bo taken lo proven tho occurence in the futur. Recommondatis do nl 126d 10 ba aero o punts. For evans, ho
vostgabcn ros. can be used 33 rani 1001]
See Memorandum dated 21 June 201%
CRORE APR TE
i “hdd
ys Faun Rass
A a OTIS § em ks
RR RE SE ms oe, rrees
USE THIS PAGE IF NEEDED. IF THIS PAGE 1S NOT NEEDED, PLEASE PROCEED TO FINAL PAGE OF THIS FORM
smaroventor Tana oaten
STATOR Cae
GR FORE WOVE HET
Pies 23 rough 2 rtd for telling sons
a
DES Exon wane)
SECRET
_ Page intentionally left blank.
2
“seeRer
Pas 26 hough 2 edict he long css
DA 1 eH 945) 10SEC § 1508) (461, ATH) (THE)
BS Bd
DAD 04) BAIDU SC 8 1300) (a6, ATH) OTHE)
DBT LE on io re
HODES HEL KE mene
SOY STAY REFERRAL
U'| Hope this helps... keep em coming and I do my best to get you what you need
vie
roe SA ORE,
Sent: Thursday une 7, 2018 11:02 PM
cl
Subject: {5 NR "OC React
U'] Thanks for the data, this i great. | have a few additional questions about this strike for ight now
rm the 7 ER 2! oversees RINSE <<! fro: © hit ne
Fow wo: 0. i (his 2 viable
Larger? Li LO
Whatis the interaction between RNR
Whatis your process for determinine INMISENSRNGRNGIR] - 0:
0 you tll have thelglllj og from the strike on 1 APR? We do
poe NER NLTITL
Sent Thursday June 7.2018 6:57 PM
a
ce
Subject: RE- 5 HA Request 2 a
CLASSIFICATION-GEGRET
CAVEATS NOFA
TERMS. NONE
er our discussion, ERSIRMIEEIERo: ven appointed by th IRN the Investigating Officer in the [ENNIS
RRR sc. Looking to get a few questions answered and provide an JIRlIPOC for any follow on
Here are the initial questions
5 ow veo 125
[5] nats the interaction between p
Whatis your process for determining pr nor?
Do you still have the os from the RIG strike on 1 APR?
[07] 1 have cc'cflilflso you have his contact information and looped in [JiR Thank vou in advance and
please let me know f you need anything else from me
Very Respecituly
ss A BT
Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 6:12 Ad
To
Subject: At oC Request
Message Body Clasicaton: SEEREF/HNOFORN-
[07] can you lease provide me the folowing data for my investigation?
[ST How was Ea) | thi 2 viable
Earger?
[57] Vhats the interaction between EENEEEENNCENCCN
~~ What is your process for determining [NII © ot?
Do you stil have thell o from the [EMMI +e on 1 APR?
5] have been appointed by the [ERR = the nvestgating Officer in to RN se.
hank you for your time
room: (USEMAA MLL
Th SR
oo
Suit pocheaues
CLASSIFICATION SEoREF
re One
an
eA,
[U7] vy apologies fo the dela. Good to hear fom you, hope ails wel on your end. ve coped IRRRRRRRIR] (rir).
POC information for you. | have lefffflout any of the above nt a RR youn the right
[U] Let me know if you don't get the info you need.
"
BE
o
iS hooe this message finds vou well but | need a favor. Can you give me a contact in IRIIRISIN
E. an nesting ts OVA tos
ae
CLASSIFICATION SEGRE
CAVEATS NON
TERMS: NONE
Message Body Classification: SECREF/NOFORN-
CLASSIFICATION WIO ATCH-SECREF—
CAVEATS WIO ATCH-NGFORN
TERMS WIO ATCH NONE
CLASSIFICATION-SEGRET—
CAVEATS NOFORN-
TERMS NONE
CLASSIFICATION WIO ATCH- SEGRE
CAVEATS WIO ATCH NONE
TERMS WIO ATCH NONE
CLASSIFICATION-SEGREF-
CAVEATS -NOFORN-
TERMS NONE
Attachment Clasification-SECRET//NOFORN—
~~ Message Body Classification: SECREF/NOFORN-—
Classification: SECRETAMORORN.
Message Body Classification SECREF//NOFORN
Classifications SECREFH/MOFSAN—
8
Pas 90 bough 2 cd fr te loin cons:
OKI al (XH Hey
~SECRETNGFORN—
S| sre CCAR ICO 1 APR 2018 KIS EI Buur, Somalia
[S | civeas credibility assessment for the 01 APR 18 Kinetic Strike targeting assessed al Shabaab
= (as) Torvers [EN © 5... Gaiguduud. Somalia.
[5] BLUE: Folowing social media reports of CIVCAS, te [RIRISMSIRIEMERRN ro evied enhance
[=1 ISR cotage of he event and concludaa hat one femaie and potentially one cid were Kile,
along wih four adut males, wno JTHIB Gontiied in post sie reporting as AS operates.
STF levied al reasonably avaiable informatio related o he kine sirke conducted on
1 April 2018 VO El Buur. Galguduud, Somalia, to include the assessment produced by the [RISISESESENEINEE
SN 7 urs with the [IRR 21 C1\/CAS allegations related
"0 hs Ske are credible
U7] who: 7+ Im
[S| what: on 01 Apri 2018, s+ Illconducted a kinetic strike vit ERNEEG—
against what was oral assessed o be a group of four adult mae (ADM) AS operas.
2Ssocaied win VO 1 Buur. Galguduud Somalia
adult males targeted n th sie were AS operates (ENISCNE 10 Talo
Roncombatants would bs ured or led. an EES at no women or chien would
be ured or kiled
[U7] wHEN: 01 14242 April 2018
| WHERE: IVO 1 Burr, Galguduud Somalia
[5] why: There were some socal media and fher open source reports claiming that th sirke
{argeled a cian convoy and tht three cians were Kile, to include prominen elders and at
leas! one woman. This CAR serves as the JT [gllfsssessment regarding th iolhood of
vlan casuals.
AMPLIFYING DETAIL
E Er
—SECRETNOFORN-
Pus 4 rough redacted he lowing ress
TEXT) Ha) BX He) (DH) (10 SC § 13001, (KO (XTC)
+ [SRI o/oving the strike. the [MINN ose the EINEIONN and assessed
at here were five and not four ADMS inside he venice when 1 was struck
SECREFHNOFORN.
| ide
56) ACTIONS TAKEN: Uon receipt of INRANGE =r. + MIRE
Conducted a feviw of he tke process 0 carl Getermine he possiily of CIVCAS
and dani methods of reducing CIVCAS i ure sires. Despile multiple pre- and
post sire FI reviews oy IAAI tc: ently
assessed {nat any women or chien aged up in th tracted vehicle. Th [Keiihood of
CIVCAS only became clear when RIMINI 1 h decades of combined
SOF GEOINT ousrence and
"eviied he [SR footage The apparent resuts o
ihe sire notwinstanding. JTF {Gls Satie ha all control measures ‘or an EIMIBGHEN
Sirke were folowed, appropriate Measures 1o migate cian casualles were taken.
an ihe commander met targeting cra using all avaiable nforaion 0 nude the
I Ee
ICTIEIONCIECN 1.1" eV. | appears 131 a
Woman was misidentified a5 an ADM and a ch ma have catered he arated vehicle
ingeiocies. Accordingly. after a review ot
NN 7 [gl] ccs thst CIVCAS allegations related
1 the 01 Apr 2016 Kinet sinke VG Bt Buur, Somalia ae credible
5] 7) WAY AHEAD: JTF Ill has considered multe strategies to reduc the possiviiy of
CIVCAS. nowever gach proposal has ascomaning adkanizaes and dacvaniadss
57] CONCLUSION: In tis specifc instance, tne EINER or is eaders mace
ihe best possible assessment wil the formation hat was avaiabie to them. Ths information
was appropriately passed to the TF Gl Commander for evaluation The JT NH ENOINPEIN STONE
EENGEIESERE 1 o oroelcd novcuals were ENTREE
ORION cos hal 0 male noncombatants woud be injured or kiled
SECRET/NOFORN—
—SEGREFINOFORN—
RRR +: vormen o chide would be nr or kiled before conducting he 01
April 2018 kinetic strike. JTF [lllwil continue to pursue any and all opportunities to mitigate.
ne isk of lan casualties in carying ou diet acon mission
—secRerivOrORN—
« SI say June 13 2015 BU An
- ps LE i]
Subject: REFS) CIVCAS 15-6 RFI - ASAP
pon post:strike review, both parties - gr) s was al prio EE —— depth analysis that revealed a femal
being misidentified as a male during the vehicle loadup. The CCAR should lay out those details as well. If the CCA
0 LS
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 8:19 PM
EE
Subject: RE-{SFCIVCAS 15-6 RFI - ASAP.
U JNo. The female was misidentified as a male. The POSS child was completely missed until the CIVCAS review.
vos A ERT
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 12:43 PM
EL EERE
Sublect-{5) CVCAS 15:6 AFI - ASAP
Importance: High
lassfcation-SECRETHNGFORN—
Message Body Classfication-SECREF//NOFORN-
Al,
[U7] 1 need a response from both the [ESIGN on this one:
[5 oid either team ever think or actually make a change in Bla for the strike against IRM 1 so.
id that ever get conveyed to JRRISRRIRY 1f no change infill was made but needed to be, why wasn't
i?
Thank you.
Message Body Classification: SEERE//NOFORN-
- Fes EE
Subject ES OVERS TSO ASAT
or
©
Siac EHVCRS 1 RR AP
Al,
[07] need response from both te RSA + one
[5] pid either team ever think or actually make a change in{Eiilllcall for the strike against ENNNEERNNNN If so,
did that ever get conveyed to COR TFG? If no change in [@illicall was made but needed to be, why wasn't
i
Thankyou
Message Body Classification SECRET//NOFORN—
G—————
>
IS
*
el b |
L
Paes 105 ough 106 edd for ell reson
OK a 61 Hey
Unfortunately, | was out of the JOC during [RIIIEN and
ned betore the actuation accor NR (+o = <9) e on RN
regard to any potential collateral concerns. Tha, combined with the physical separation of us and thei ends me to
A Ta
or AS
J] + All times are based on the video clip in this director RE EG
oe
i It HA —
Wire Baty Casio SSERETNDIOR.
Gens,
57] guess am missing someting
[5 RB con you plese ive me th timeline from lt when IRRMMRRIERN orived in the JOC and who
vided the SITREP to them? | don't need names but assuming the brief was given by the | SISIIRIIRRGEN
I io, sccovding to
isos how
ACR
JIM 5 very aware of ths situation and want o pant as accurate of a picture a possible so we ean capture
the lessons learned and where we can move forward. The compounding issue here i Jill turns into a
pumpkin eet week so | am up against a hard deadline,
Thanks,
Message Body Classification: SECREF/NGFOM
To i ee —
Sebict ye
re IR BL
RT Sa,
Soviet 5 meine?
Gents,
[57] guess 1 am missing something. (EH
[5 TRB con you please give me the timeline from lof when [QBN arrived in the JOC and who
provided the SITREP to them? | don't need names but assuming the brief wa given by the
Also, according to
? Also, how
a
U JIG is very aware ofthis situation and | want to pint as accurate ofa picture as possible so we can capture
the lessons learned and where we can move forward. The compounding issue here is fl terns intoa
pumpkin next week so | am up against hard deadline.
Thanks,
Message Body Classfcation SECREF//NOFORN-
/ i
ror
Ey]
S | thanks lll 11 need to know how many people are on the team and answers to each of the questions
5 ro
Ga
5) Rc cn 1 RRR vi ve vac on shite sno RRR 1+ +0 t 8c you
roe LRA ML
i
Message Body Classification: SECRET//NOFORN
Ei
Thank you.
Atessage Body Classification SECRET//NOFORN—
CLASSIFICATION-SEGRET—
CAVEATS NOFORN-
TERMS: NONE
Message Body Classification: SEGREF/NOFORN-—
wm: ILL
To: Re NO
GLASSIFICATION-SEGRET
Er Roron
Sexe Nowe
ror A
Som rd une 132018 1104 A
Tor
Sor RE Epes Lois?
[5 JMB acd me question that | couldnt answer so hoping you can: Can you confi tha the
|U [if there is a difference in these capabilities, why?
rae NN
or
Som LBL WE 0%
CLASSFICATION-SEGRE.
CAVEATS orORN
TERNS NONE
For I
Sent: Frida, June 15, 2018 5:35 AM
HEE
oe
Importance: ih
<essage Body Classification: SECAEFNOOMN-
Thank you.
Message Sody Classification: SECAEFHNOSORN.
DO —
OE (W3N 10S C$ 1500) (XO, (NXE)